Form: Psychological Research
Preregistration-Quantitative (aka PRP-QUANT) Template (v1)
This vignette shows the Psychological Research
Preregistration-Quantitative (aka PRP-QUANT) Template form. It can be
initialized as follows:
After this, content can be specified with preregr::prereg_specify()
To check the next field(s) for which content still has to be specified,
The form’s metadata is:
||Psychological Research Preregistration-Quantitative
(aka PRP-QUANT) Template
||Preregistration Task Force members from the American
Psychological Association (APA): Fred Oswald - Open Science and
Methodology Committee Member; Rose Sokol-Chang - Publisher, APA Journals
and Books; Amanda Clinton - Director, APA International Affairs, from
the British Psychological Society (BPS): Daryl O’Connor - Chair of the
BPS Research Board; Lisa Coulthard - Head of Research and Impact, from
the German Psychological Society (DGP): Christian Fiebach - Secretary
and Open Science Committee Member, from the Leibniz Institute for
Psychology (ZPID): Michael Bosnjak - Director; Stefanie Müller - Head of
study planning, data collection, and data analysis services; Camila Azúa
- Research Assistant, from the Center for Open Science (COS): David
Mellor - Director of Policy Initiatives
||Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., … Wagenmakers,
E.-J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human
Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the
American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 Appelbaum, M.,
Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M.
(2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in
psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force
report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
Bowman, S. D., DeHaven, A. C., Errington, T. M., Hardwicke, T. E.,
Mellor, D. T., Nosek, B. A., & Soderberg, C. K. (2016). OSF Prereg
Template. Retrieved from osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/epgjd Simonsohn, U.,
Simmons, J., & Nelson, L. (2017). AsPredicted. Retrieved from https://aspredicted.org/messages/terms.php
Van den Akker, O., Weston, S. J., Campbell, L., Chopik, W. J., Damian,
R. I., Davis-Kean, P., Hall, A., Kosie, J., Kruse, E., Olsen, J.,
Stuart, R., Valentine, K., van ’t Veer, A., & Bakker, M. (2019,
November 20). Preregistration of secondary data analysis: A template and
tutorial. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hvfmr | |version |1.0
The form is defined as follows (use preregr::form_show()
to show the form in the console, instead):
Psychological Research Preregistration-Quantitative (aka PRP-QUANT)
As an international effort toward increasing psychology’s commitment
to creating a stronger culture and practice of preregistration, a
multi-society Preregistration Task Force* was formed, following the 2018
meeting of the German Psychological Society in Frankfurt, Germany. The
Task Force created a detailed preregistration template that benefited
from the APA JARS Quantitative Research guidelines, as well as a
comprehensive review of many other preregistration templates.
This entry features the template, PRP_QUANT, in its current (and
previous) version. The template can be downloaded here as .xlsx
(Microsoft Excel), .docx (Microsoft Word), .odt (Libre Office) or .ipynb
(JupyterLab) file or it can be filled out online via https://forms.gle/9YgAoJn4ZYPXtHGk9 (a PDF will be
automatically generated and send via email).
For more information about preregistration and the template in
particular, we recommend watching the following webinar: https://zpid.cloud.panopto.eu/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=10e5776c-363a-4658-b458-acae007121a2
(or browse the slides via the link under “related items”). It shows the
launch of the template on October 27, 2020, featuring two keynote
speakers: Simine Vazire of University of Melbourne, and E. J.
Wagenmakers of University of Amsterdam.
Sections and items
Section: Title and title page
Contributors, Affiliations, and Persistent IDs (recommend ORCID iD)
Provide in separate entries the full name of each contributor, each
contributor’s professional affiliation, and each contributor’s
persistent ID. See ORCID iD for an example of persistent ID (hyperlink:
Optional: include the intended contribution of each person listed
(e.g. statistical analysis, data collection; see CRediT, hyperlink: https://credit.niso.org/
Date of Preregistration
This is assigned by the system upon preregistration submission.
This is assigned by the system upon submission of original and
subsequent revisions. Should be a persistent identifier, if not a DOI.
This unique identifier is assigned by the system upon submission.
Estimated duration of project
Include best estimate for how long the project will take from
preregistration submission to project completion.
IRB Status (Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics
Committee/Ethical Review Board/Research Ethics Board)
If the study will include human or animal subjects, provide a brief
overview of plans for the treatment of those subjects in accordance with
established ethical guidelines. If appropriate institutional approval
has been obtained for the study, provide the relevant identifier here.
If the study will be exempt from ethical board review, provide reasoning
Conflict of Interest Statement
Identify any real or perceived conflicts of interest with this study
execution. For example, any interests or activities that might be seen
as influencing the research (e.g., financial interests in a test or
procedure, funding by pharmaceutical companies for research).
Include terms specific to your topic, methodology, and population. Use
natural language and avoid words used in the title or overly general
terms. If you need help with keywords, try a keyword search using your
proposed keywords in a search engine to check results.
Data accessibility statement and planned repository
We plan to make the data available (yes / no) If “yes”, please
specify the planned data availability level by selecting one of the
- Data access via download; usage of data for all purposes (public use
- Data access via download; usage of data restricted to scientific
purposes (scientific use file)
- Data access via download; usage of data has to be agreed and defined
on an individual case basis
- Data access via secure data center (no download, usage/analysis only
in a secure data center)
- Data available upon email request by member of scientific community
-Other (please specify)
Optional: Code availability
We plan to make the code available (yes / no) If “yes”, please specify
the planned code availability (use same descriptors of data in T10)
Optional: Standard lab practices
Standard lab practices refer to a (timestamped) document, software
package, or similar, which specifies standard pipelines, analytical
decisions, etc. which always apply to certain types of research in a
lab. Specify here and refer to at the appropriate positions in the
remainder of the template: We plan to make the standard lab practices
available (yes / no). If “yes”, please specify the planned standard lab
practices availability level (use same descriptors of data in T10).
Section: Abstract (150 words)
Objectives and Research questions
(See introduction I2)
Section: Introduction (no word limit)
Provide a brief overview that justifies the research hypotheses.
Objectives and Research question(s)
Outline objectives and research questions that inform the methodology
and analyses (below).
Hypothesis (H1, H2, …)
Provide hypothesis for predicted results. If multiple hypotheses,
uniquely number them (e.g. H1, H2a, H2b) and refer to them the same way
at other points in the registration document and in the manuscript.
Exploratory research questions (if applicable; E1, E2, …)
If planning exploratory analyses, provide rationale for them here. If
multiple exploratory analyses, uniquely number them (E1, E2, …) and
refer to them in the same way in the registration document and in future
Time point of registration
Select one of the options:
- Registration prior to creation of data
- Registration prior to any human observation of the data
- Registration prior to accessing the data
- Registration prior to analysis of the data
- Other (please specify; might include if T1 longitudinal data has
been analyzed, but T2 has not yet been analyzed)
Proposal: Use of pre-existing data (re-analysis or secondary data
Will pre-existing data be used in the planned study? If yes, indicate if
the data were previously published and specify the source of the data
(e.g., DOI or APA style reference of original publication). Specify your
level of knowledge of the data (e.g., descriptive statistics from
previous publications), whether or not this is relevant for the
hypotheses of the present study, and how it is assured that you are
unaware of results or statistical patterns in the data of relevance to
the present hypotheses.
Sample size, power and precision
- Relevant sample sizes: e.g., single groups, multiple groups, and
sample sizes (or sample ranges) found at each level of multilevel data.
(2) Provide power analysis (e.g. power curves) for fixed-N designs. For
sequential designs, indicate your ‘stopping rule’ such as the points at
which you intend to be viewing your data and in any way analyzing them
(e.g., t-tests and correlations, but even descriptively such as with
Participant recruitment, selection, and compensation
Indicate (a) methods of recruitment (e.g., subject pool advertisement,
community events, crowdsourcing platforms, snowball sampling); (b)
selection and inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g., age, visual acuity,
language facility); (c) details of any stratification sampling used; (d)
planned participant characteristics (gender, race/ethnicity, sexual
orientation and gender identity, SES, education level, age, disability
or health status, geographic location); (e) compensation amount and
method (e.g., same payment to all, pay based on performance, lottery).
How will participant drop-out be handled?
Indicate any special treatment for participants who drop out (e.g.,
there is follow-up in a manner different from the main sample, last
value carried forward) or whether participants are replaced.
Masking of participants and researchers
Indicate all forms of masking and/or allocation concealment (e.g.,
administrators, data collectors, raters, confederates are unaware of
condition to which participants were assigned).
Data cleaning and screening
Indicate all steps related to data quality control, e.g., outlier
treatment, identification of missing data, checks for normality, etc.
How will missing data be handled?
Indicate any procedures that will be applied during the analysis to deal
with missing data, such as (a) case deletions; (b) averaging across
scale items (to handle missing items for some); (c) test of missingness
(MAR, MCAR, MNAR assumptions; (d) imputation procedures (FIML vs. MI);
(e) Intention to treat analysis and per protocol analysis (as
Other information (optional)
For example, training of raters/participants or anything else not yet
Type of study and study design
Indicate the type of study (e.g., experimental, observational,
crosssectional vs. longitudinal, single case, clinical trial) and
planned study design (e.g., between vs. within subjects, factorial,
repeated measures, etc.), number of factors and factor levels, etc..
Randomization of participants and/or experimental materials
If applicable, describe how participants are assigned to conditions or
treatments, how stimuli are assigned to conditions, and how presentation
of tests, trials, etc. is randomized. Indicate the randomization
technique and whether constraints were applied (pseudo-randomization).
Indicate any type of balancing across participants (e.g., assignments of
responses to hands, etc.).
Measured variables, manipulated variables, covariates
This section shall be used to unambiguously clarify which variables are
used to operationalize the hypotheses specified above (item I3). Please
(a) list all measured variables, and (b) explicitly state the functional
role of each variable (i.e., independent variable, dependent variable,
covariate, mediator, moderator). It is important to (c) specify for each
hypothesis how it is operationalized, i.e., which variables will be used
to test the respective hypothesis and how the hyothesis will be
operationally defined in terms of these variables. The description here
shall be consistent with the statistical analysis plans specified under
Please describe any relevant study materials. This could include, for
example, stimulus materials used for experiments, questionnaires used
for rating studies, training protocols for intervention studies, etc.
Please describe here any relevant information about how the study will
be conducted, e.g., the number and timing of measurement time points for
longitudinal research, the number of blocks or runs per session of an
experiment, laboratory setting, the group size in group testing, the
number of training sessions in interventional studies, questionnaire
administration for online assessments, etc.
Other information (optional)
Section: Analysis plan
Criteria for post-data collection exclusion of participants, if any
Describe all criteria that will lead to the exclusion of a participant’s
data (e.g. performance criteria, non-responding in physiological
measures, incomplete data). Be as specific as possible.
Criteria for post-data collection exclusions on trial level (if
Describe all criteria that will lead to the exclusion of a trial or item
(e.g. statistical outliers, response time criteria). Be as specific as
Describe all data manipulations that are performed in preparation of the
main analyses, e.g. calculation of variables or scales, recoding, any
data transformations, preprocessing steps for imaging or physiological
data (or refer to publicly accessible standard lab procedure, cf. T12).
Reliability analysis (if applicable)
Specify the type of scale reliability that will be estimated, whether it
is internal consistency (e.g. Cronbach’s alpha, omega), test-retest
reliability, or some other form (e.g., a confirmatory factor analysis
incorporating multiple factors as sources of variance). In a study
involving measure development, researchers should specify criteria for
removing items from measures a priori (e.g., largest factor loading
magnitude, smallest drop in alpha-if-item removed).
Specify which descriptive statistics will be calculated for which
variables. If appropriate, specify which indices of effect size will be
used. If descriptive statistics are linked to specific hypotheses,
explicitly link the information given here to the respective hypothesis.
Statistical models (provide for each hypothesis if varies)
Specify the statistical model (e.g. t test, ANOVA, LMM) that will be
used to test each of your hypotheses. Give all necessary information
about model specification (e.g., variables, interactions, planned
contrasts) and follow-up analyses. Include model selection criteria
(e.g., fit indices), corrections for multiple testing, and tests for
statistical violations, if applicable. Wherever unclear, describe how
effect sizes will be calculated (e.g., for d-values, use the control SD
or the pooled SD).
Specify the criteria used for inferences (e.g., p values, Bayes factors,
effect size measures) and the thresholds for accepting or rejecting your
hypotheses. If possible, define a smallest effect size of interest. If
inference criteria differ between hypotheses, specify separately for
each hypothesis and respective statistical model by explicitly referring
to the numbers of the hypotheses. Describe which effect size measures
will be reported and how they are calculated.
Exploratory analysis (optional)
Describe any exploratory analyses to be conducted with your data.
Include here any planned analyses that are not confirmatory in the sense
of being a direct test of one of the specified hypotheses.
Other information (optional)
Section: Other information, optional
Other information (optional)